Skip to main content

Triggering final follicular maturation for IVF cycles

A Correction to this article was published on 20 February 2025

This article has been updated

Abstract

As part of a conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, final follicular maturation is usually triggered by a single bolus dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). COH, which combines GnRH antagonist co-treatment with GnRH agonist(GnRHa) trigger, is often used in attempts to eliminate severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and to improve oocyte/embryo yield and quality. Recently, the combination of GnRHa, with hCG trigger has also been implemented into clinical practice. Here, we analyze and discuss published studies on various ways of triggering final follicular maturation, seeking to elucidate the appropriateness of each approach for specific patient subgroups.

Introduction

During the ovulatory cycle, sufficient production of estradiol by the preovulatory follicle induces a midcycle surge of luteinizing hormone (LH). This is followed by a loss of gap junctions between the oocyte and cumulus cells, cumulus expansion, germinal vesicle breakdown, resumption of meiosis, and luteinization of the granulosa cells (GCs). The consequent increase in progesterone synthesis facilitates the positive feedback action of estradiol to induce the concomitant midcycle peak of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [1]. This peak FSH has several roles; these include ensuring an adequate complement of LH receptors on the granulosa layer and the synthesis of hyaluronic acid matrix, which facilitates the expansion and dispersion of the cumulus cells, allowing the oocyte-cumulus cell mass to float freely in the antral fluid [1].

What controls the midcycle LH/FSH peak?

As shown in Fig. 1, kisspeptin neurons, residing within the preoptic area and the infundibular nucleus in the human hypothalamus, co-express neurokinin B and dynorphin (KNDy neurons). Via the neurokinin B and kappa opioid peptide receptors, KNDy neurons autosynaptically regulate secretion of pulsatile kisspeptin, with neurokinin B being stimulatory and dynorphin inhibitory. Kisspeptin signals directly to GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus to secrete gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), which in turn, is responsible for activating secretion of LH/FSH [2].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Triggering final follicular maturation: neuroendocrine control

How can we trigger final follicular maturation?

Human chorionic gonadotropin

As part of a standard/conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, final follicular maturation is usually triggered by a single bolus dose (5000–10,000 units) of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), administered as close as possible to the time of ovulation (36 h before oocyte recovery) [3]. A surrogate to the naturally occurring LH surge, hCG induces luteinization of the GCs, final oocyte maturation, and resumption of meiosis.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) almost always presents either 3–7 days after hCG administration in susceptible patients (“early onset”) or during early pregnancy, 12–17 days after hCG administration (“late onset”). Individualization of treatment based on the specific risk factor and response in the current cycle, with the option of freezing all embryos or replacing just one, can reduce the risk and the severity of OHSS in susceptible cases [4]. Moreover, although withholding the ovulation-inducing hCG trigger has the potential to eliminate severe early OHSS, this approach can be frustrating for the patient and is costly in terms of both time and money.

Recombinant luteinizing hormone

The European Recombinant Human LH Study Group [5] conducted a prospective, comparative, dose-finding study to compare hCG (5000 IU) with different recombinant human (rhLH) doses (5000, 15,000, 30,000 IU; or 15,000 IU followed 3 days later by 10,000 IU) to induce final follicular maturation in patients undergoing the long GnRH agonist (GnRHa) COH protocol. Although the lowest dose of rhLH (5000 IU) seemed suboptimal compared with the higher dose (15,000 IU), no significant differences were observed between the four doses of rhLH and their corresponding hCG group with regard to the number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes retrieved per follicle with a diameter > 10 mm on the day of trigger, oocyte maturation, or number of embryos; nor the number of total, biochemical, and clinical pregnancies, or embryo implantation rate. However, in many of these parameters, in terms of safety, no moderate or severe OHSS was reported in patients who received a single dose of rhLH up to 30,000 IU. The investigators concluded that a single dose of rhLH is effective in inducing final follicular maturation comparable with 5000 IU hCG, with a highly significant reduction in OHSS compared with hCG. Moreover, the dose of rhLH giving the highest efficacy/safety ratio was between 15,000 and 30,000 IU. These observations are promising, but rhLH is expensive to produce.

GnRH agonist

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, combining GnRH antagonist co-treatment and GnRHa trigger, has become standard practice to eliminate the risk of severe early OHSS [6]. However, this approach is reported to result in fewer clinical pregnancies and increased first-trimester pregnancy loss [7]. Measures introduced to improve reproductive outcome include a “freeze-all” policy, fresh transfer and intensive luteal support, and fresh transfer with low-dose hCG supplementation; each of these has its inherent advantages and disadvantages [8].

Kisspeptin

In 2014, Jayasena et al. [9] published their first dose-finding study of a single subcutaneous injection of kisspeptin-54 (1.6, 3.2, 6.4, and 12.8 nmol/kg) to induce final follicular maturation in patients undergoing the GnRH antagonist COH protocol for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Egg maturation was observed in response to each tested dose of kisspeptin, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 23%.

Later studies by the same group [10, 11] have demonstrated that the highest oocyte yield was observed following 12.8 nmol/kg kisspeptin, which was 69% greater than following 3.2 nmol/kg. The highest pregnancy rates were observed following 9.6 nmol/kg kisspeptin, with no woman developing moderate or severe OHSS. In women at high risk of OHSS, these studies showed that the effectiveness of a single injection of kisspeptin (9.6 nmol/kg) 36 h before oocyte retrieval was improved by a second dose 10 h later.

A higher proportion of patients achieved an oocyte yield ≥ 60% following a second dose of kisspeptin, without increasing the frequency of ovarian over-response or moderate OHSS. Again, the major disadvantage of kisspeptin trigger is the cost of the preparation.

hCG versus GnRHa trigger

When comparing the effect of hCG versus GnRHa trigger on the different follicular maturation variables following an IVF treatment cycle, studies have revealed that the number of oocytes retrieved, percentage of mature oocytes, and number of top-quality embryos were either comparable or in favor of the GnRHa trigger. Moreover, studies of the downstream effects of LH receptor activation by LH or hCG have demonstrated that LH has a greater impact on AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation (responsible for proliferation, differentiation, and survival of GCs), while hCG generates higher intracellular cAMP accumulation, which stimulates steroidogenesis (progesterone production) [12, 13].

Moreover, human mural GCs gene expression related to steroidogenesis (StAR/CYP19) and oocyte maturation (COX2/Amphiregulin) in cultured GCs have demonstrated that the addition of LH + FSH + hCG showed higher activation of steroidogenesis and maturation as compared to the naturally occurring trigger (LH + FSH) and the hCG triggers [14]. Moreover, while the naturally occurring trigger (LH + FSH) activated maturation significantly and more intensely than the hCG trigger, no between-group differences were observed with regard to steroidogenic-related genes.

Based on these observations, GnRHa, combined with hCG trigger, for final follicular maturation has been implemented in clinical practice. Modes and timing of administration should be appropriately tailored to various subgroups of IVF patients.

Dual-trigger standard hCG dose concomitant with GnRHa, 35–37 h before oocyte retrieval

Research findings demonstrating comparable or even improved maturity and quality of oocytes/embryos following GnRHa trigger, as compared to hCG trigger, and the different effects of LH and hCG on the downstream signaling of the LH receptor, have led to a new strategy for final follicular maturation: concomitant administration of both GnRHa and a standard bolus of hCG (5000–10,000 units) prior to oocyte retrieval. This approach aims to improve oocyte and embryo quality, to optimize the ultimate outcome of the IVF cycle.

Lin et al. [15], in their retrospective cohort study, compared IVF outcome in normal-responder patients undergoing COH using GnRHa with either a standard dose of hCG trigger (6500 IU recombinant hCG) or the dual trigger (0.2 mg triptorelin + 6500 IU recombinant hCG) 35–36 h prior to oocyte retrieval. The dual-trigger group demonstrated a statistically significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved, matured oocytes, and number of embryos cryopreserved; this resulted in a significant increase in implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates compared with the hCG-only trigger group.

In a subsequent prospective randomized controlled trial of normal-responder patients, Decleer et al. [16] compared IVF outcome following either 5000 IU hCG trigger or a combination of GnRHa plus 5000 IU hCG concomitantly, 36 h prior to oocyte retrieval. Although no between-group differences were observed in the mean number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, or pregnancy rates, the number of patients who received at least one embryo of excellent quality and the number of cryopreserved embryos were significantly higher following the dual trigger.

In a single-center randomized study (155 normal responders), using the dual trigger for final follicular maturation, has demonstrated an increased number of oocytes, mature oocytes, and number of blastocysts (total and top-quality) compared with hCG alone. Clinical pregnancies (46.1% vs. 24.3%) and cumulative delivery rate (36.2% vs. 22%) were significantly higher in the dual-trigger group [17].

Double trigger- GnRHa 40 h and standard hCG added 34 h prior to OPU, respectively

Beck-Fruchter et al. [18] have described a case of recurrent empty follicle syndrome, successfully treated by ovulation trigger with GnRHa and hCG added 40 h and 34 h, respectively, before oocyte retrieval. They assumed that by prolonging the time between ovulation triggering and OPU [19] and the GnRHa trigger with the consequent simultaneous induction of an FSH surge, the “double trigger” could overcome any existing impairments in GC function, oocyte meiotic maturation, or cumulus expansion, resulting in successful aspiration of mature oocytes, pregnancy, and delivery.

Encouraged by these findings, we offered the double-trigger approach to two groups of patients showing abnormal final follicular maturation despite normal response to COH: those with < 50% oocytes retrieved per number of dominant follicles > 14 mm in diameter on day of hCG administration [20], and those with < 66% mature/metaphase-II (MII) oocytes per number of oocytes retrieved [21].

In the group with < 50% oocytes retrieved per number of dominant follicles, following the double trigger, patients had a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved, number of 2PN, and number of embryos transferred, and significantly higher proportions of number of oocytes retrieved to number of follicles > 10 and > 14 mm in diameter on day of hCG administration, with a tendency toward a higher number of top-quality embryos, compared with the hCG-only trigger cycles [20].

In the group with < 66% MII oocytes per number of oocytes retrieved, following the double trigger, patients yielded a significantly higher number of MII oocytes and proportion of MII oocytes per number of oocytes retrieved, resulting in a significantly increased number of top-quality embryos, compared with the hCG-only trigger cycles [21].

Standard hCG dose concomitant with GnRHa (dual trigger), 34 h before OPU

According to the Bologna criteria [22], the minimal criteria needed to define poor ovarian response (POR) are the presence of at least two of the following three features:

  • Advanced maternal age (≥ 40 years) or any other risk factor for POR.

  • A previous POR (≤ 3 oocytes with a conventional stimulation protocol).

  • An abnormal ovarian reserve test.

One of the major unnoticed concern in this group of poor responders is the observed high prevalence of premature luteinization/ovulation [23, 24], which may be overcome by early triggering of final follicular maturation (when approaching a follicular size of 15–16 mm) and by shortening the duration between the trigger and OPU. However, since shortening the interval between hCG priming and oocyte retrieval can decrease the percentage of mature oocytes [25], an additional measure should be implemented to improve the number of oocytes retrieved to the number of follicles > 10 mm, as well as to increase the proportion of mature oocytes. Suggested measures to achieve this are to dual trigger 34 h before OPU when the leading follicle reaches > 17 mm in diameter, or to double trigger when the leading follicle reaches < 17 mm in diameter on the day of trigger [25, 26].

Conclusions

This review explores published studies relating to various means of triggering final follicular maturation, indicating how to tailor each approach for specific patient subgroups (Fig. 2). We believe that adopting appropriately tailored trigger strategies has the potential to improve IVF outcomes for patients [26].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Triggering final follicular maturation

Data availability

Not applicable.

Change history

Abbreviations

COH:

controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

FSH:

follicle-stimulating hormone

GC:

granulosa cell

GnRH[a]:

gonadotropin-releasing hormone [agonist

hCG:

human chorionic gonadotropin

IVF:

in-vitro fertilization

LH:

luteinizing hormone

MII:

mature/metaphase-II

OHSS:

ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OPU:

oocyte pick-up

POR:

poor ovarian response

rhLH:

recombinant human luteinizing hormone

References

  1. Fritz MA, Speroff L, editors. Regulation of the menstrual cycle. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

  2. Skorupskaite K, George JT, Anderson RA. The kisspeptin-GnRH pathway in human reproductive health and disease. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:485–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ludwig M, Doody KJ, Doody KM. Use of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in ovulation induction. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1051–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Orvieto R. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome – an optimal solution for an unresolved enigma. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. The European Recombinant Human LH Study Group. Recombinant human luteinizing hormone (LH) to support recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-induced follicular development in LH- and FSH-deficient anovulatory women: a dose-finding study. The European Recombinant Human LH Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:1507–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orvieto R. Can we eliminate severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Hum Reprod. 2005;20:320–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Youssef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus hCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD008046.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orvieto R. Triggering final follicular maturation-hCG, GnRH-agonist or both, when and to whom? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1415–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jayasena CN, Abbara A, Comninos AN, Nijher GM, Christopoulos G, Narayanaswamy S, et al. Kisspeptin-54 triggers egg maturation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:3667–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbara A, Jayasena CN, Christopoulos G, Narayanaswamy S, Izzi-Engbeaya C, Nijher GM, et al. Efficacy of kisspeptin-54 to trigger oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:3322–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbara A, Clarke S, Islam R, Prague JK, Comninos AN, Narayanaswamy S, et al. A second dose of kisspeptin-54 improves oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1915–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Casarini L, Lispi M, Longobardi S, Milosa F, La Marca A, Tagliasacchi D, et al. LH and hCG action on the same receptor results in quantitatively and qualitatively different intracellular signalling. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Haas J, Ophir L, Barzilay E, Machtinger R, Yung Y, Orvieto R, et al. Standard human chorionic gonadotropin versus double trigger for final oocyte maturation results in different granulosa cells gene expressions: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:653–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yung Y, Aizer A, Tieb S, Maydan SA, Maman E, Haham LM, et al. The in-vitro effect of gonadotropins’ type and combination on granulosa cells gene expressions. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022;20:144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin MH, Wu FS, Lee RK, Li SH, Lin SY, Hwu YM. Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1296–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K, Seynhave B, Kolibianakis S, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6:203–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Haas J, Bassil R, Samara N, Zilberberg E, Mehta C, Orvieto R, et al. GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for final follicular maturation: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1648–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beck-Fruchter R, Weiss A, Lavee M, Geslevich Y, Shalev E. Empty follicle syndrome: successful treatment in a recurrent case and review of the literature. Hum Reprod., Wang W, Zhang XH, Wang WH, Liu YL, Zhao LH, Xue SL et al. The time interval between hCG priming and oocyte retrieval in ART program: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:901–10.

  19. Haas J, Zilberberg E, Dar S, Kedem A, Machtinger R, Orvieto R. Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation (double trigger) in patients with low number of oocytes retrieved per number of preovulatory follicles – a preliminary report. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zilberberg E, Haas J, Dar S, Kedem A, Machtinger R, Orvieto R. Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation in patients with low proportion of mature oocytes. Gyn Endocrinol. 2015;31:145–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez F, Barri PN, Coroleu B, Tur R, Sorsa-Leslie T, Harris WJ, et al. Women with poor response to IVF have lowered circulating gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) bioactivity during spontaneous and stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:634–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ben-Rafael Z, Orvieto R, Feldberg D. The poor-responder patient in an in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1994;8:277–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haas J, Zilberberg E, Nahum R, Mor Sason A, Hourvitz A, Gat I, et al. Does double trigger (GnRH-agonist + hCG) improve outcome in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET cycle? A pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:628–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Orvieto R. A simplified universal approach to COH protocol for IVF: ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist/GnRH-antagonist protocol with tailored mode and timing of final follicular maturation. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Orvieto R. Triggering final follicular maturation for IVF cycles. Pick up and Oocyte Management. Editors: Antonio Malvasi, Domenico Baldini. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Volume 23 Supplement 01, 2025:Luteinizing Hormone throughout the fertility journey. The full contents of the supplement are available at https://biomedcentral-rbej.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/articles/supplements/volume-23-supplement-1

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.O. wrote the paper, edited and proof read the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raoul Orvieto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The figure 1 and figure 2 have been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orvieto, R. Triggering final follicular maturation for IVF cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 23 (Suppl 1), 12 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12958-024-01332-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12958-024-01332-5

Keywords