Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics and clinical reproductive outcomes

From: Predictive potential of combined secretomics and image-based morphometry as a non-invasive method for selecting implanting embryos

Demographic characteristics

Whole cohort

n = 28

Implanted embryos

n = 15

Non-implanted embryos

n = 13

P-value

Sig

Maternal age (years), mean [IQR]

36 [31 - 42]

36 [31 - 42]

36 [32 - 40]

p = 0.954

ns

Female indication for ART, n (%)

   

p = 0.483

ns

 Premature ovarian failure and cycle with donated oocytes

2 (7.14%)

0 (0%)

2 (15.38%)

  

 Normal reproductive function / idiopathic infertility

11 (39.28%)

5 (33.33%)

6 (46.15%)

  

 Premature ovarian failure

3 (10.71%)

2 (13.33%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 Non-obstructive tubal lesion

1 (3.57%)

0 (0%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 Bilateral salpingectomy / cycle with donated oocytes

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 Genetic malformation

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 Endometriosis

2 (7.14%)

1 (6.67%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 Endometriosis / cycle with donated oocytes

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 Anovulation

4 (14.28%)

3 (20%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 Cycle with donated oocytes

2 (7.14%)

1 (6.67%)

1 (7.69%)

  

Male indication for ART, n (%)

   

p = 0.258

ns

 Cycle with donated semen

2 (7.14%)

1 (6.67%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 Normozoospermia

15 (53.57%)

8 (53.33%)

7 (53.85%)

  

 Teratozoospermia

3 (10.71%)

1 (6.67%)

2 (15.38%)

  

 Criptozoospermia

3 (10.71%)

1 (6.67%)

2 (15.38%)

  

 Oligoteratozoospermia

1 (3.57%)

0 (0%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 Astenoteratozoospermia

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 Oligoastenozoospermia

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 Criptozoospermia / cycle with donated semen

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 Astenozoospermia

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

Cycle-associated characteristics

 COS protocol, n (%)

   

p = 0.861

ns

 No COS

6 (21.43%)

3 (20%)

3 (23.08%)

  

 FSH only

12 (42.86%)

6 (40%)

6 (46.15%)

  

 FSH + hMG

6 (21.43%)

3 (20%)

3 (23.08%)

  

 FSH + LH

4 (14.29%)

3 (20%)

1 (7.69%)

  

Duration of stimulation (days), mean [IQR]

11 [7 - 19]

12 [10 - 19]

10 [7 - 15]

p = 0.115

ns

Daily FSH dose (IU/day), mean [IQR]

264 [84—360]

290.8 [84—360]

235 [100—300]

0.053

ns

Total FSH dose during stimulation (IU), mean [IQR]

2909 [1200—4200]

3383 [1592—4200]

2340 [1200—3600]

p = 0.005

**

Total hMG dose during stimulation (IU), mean [IQR]

282 [0—1500]

247.9 [0—1500]

322.5 [0—1500]

p = 0.858

ns

Total LH dose during stimulation (IU), mean [IQR]

266 [0—2100]

350 [0—2100]

165 [0—1650]

p = 0.444

ns

Fertilization technique, n (%)

   

NA

NA

 ICSI

28 (100%)

15 (100%)

13 (100%)

  

Embryo state, n (%)

   

p = 0.232

ns

 Fresh

25 (89.29%)

13 (86.67%)

12 (92.31%)

  

 Frozen

3 (10.71%)

2 (13.33%)

1 (7.69%)

  

Blastocyst stage, n (%)

   

p = 0.630

ns

 BC

1 (3.57%)

1 (6.67%)

0 (0%)

  

 BE

24 (85.71%)

13 (86.67%)

11 (84.62%)

  

 BHi

3 (10.71%)

1 (6.67%)

2 (15.38%)

  

Quality of transferred blastocyst, n (%)

   

p = 0.118

ns

 aa

1 (3.57%)

0 (0%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 ab

2 (7.14%)

2 (13.33%)

0 (0%)

  

 bb

14 (50%)

7 (46.67%)

7 (53.85%)

  

 bc

6 (21.43%)

5 (33.33%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 cc

5 (17.86%)

1 (6.67%)

4 (30.77%)

  

Quality of ICM, n (%)

   

p = 0.246

ns

 A

3 (10.71%)

2 (13.33%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 B

20 (71.43%)

12 (80%)

8 (61.54%)

  

 C

5 (17.86%)

1 (6.67%)

4 (30.77%)

  

Quality of TE, n (%)

   

p = 0.547

ns

 A

1 (3.57%)

0 (0%)

1 (7.69%)

  

 B

16 (57.14%)

9 (60%)

7 (53.85%)

  

 C

11 (39.29%)

6 (40%)

5 (38.46%)

  

Clinical Outcomes

 Implantation rate, n (%)

15 (53.57%)

NA

NA

NA

 

 Biochemical pregnancy rate, n (%)

1 (6.67%)

NA

NA

NA

 

 Clinical pregnancy rate, n (%)

14 (93.33%)

NA

NA

NA

 

 Clinical miscarriage rate, n (%)

3 (21.43%)

NA

NA

NA

 

 Live birth rate, n (%)

11 (78.57%)

NA

NA

NA

 
  1. This table includes data from 28/30 cycles that had complete study data. Implantation rates were calculated considering all transfer cycles (n = 28). Biochemical pregnancies and clinical pregnancy rates were calculated per positive implantation cases (n = 15). Miscarriage and live birth rates were calculated per clinical pregnancy (n = 14). Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables (i.e., female and male indications for ART, COS protocols, blastocyst state, stage and quality, as well as the quality of the ICM and TE). The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare continuous numerical variables (i.e., maternal age, duration of stimulation, the daily FSH dose, and the total FSH, hMG and LH levels during stimulation. In all cases, p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant
  2. IQR interquartile range, COS controlled ovarian stimulation, FSH follicle stimulating hormone, hMG human menopausal gonadotropin, LH luteinizing hormone, IU international units, ET embryo transfer, BC cavitated blastocyst, BE expanded blastocyst, BHi blastocyst initiating hatching, ICM inner cell mass, TE trophoectoderm, NA not applicable, ns no significant difference
  3. **p < 0.01