Fig. 3
From: IVF laboratory management through workflow-based RFID tag witnessing and real-time information entry
Error Correction Rates During Simulated Paper Label and RFID Tag Witnessing. The error detection rates were calculated by dividing the number of errors correctly detected by the total number of mixed error label/tags, and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). In the case of intentionally disrupted paper labels, the embryologist was able to identify 22 out of 25 error labels through visual inspection, resulting in an error correction rate of 88.67 ± 10.43%. However, when faced with intentionally mixed RFID tags, the embryologist was able to instantly detect all 27 errors by relying on RFID tag witnessing, achieving a 100% error correction rate. An unpaired t test was used to compare the values between the paper label and RFID tag groups, and the “*” symbol on the bar graph indicates a significant difference